Directory

SaaS Decision Makers

A verified directory of 589 people who approve software spend — with seat count owned, renewal window and whether procurement sits between you and them. Preview free, unlock the full list with a free Articuler account.

Last verified

589
SaaS decision makers

Verified in the last 30 days

241
No procurement layer

Buys without a formal process

27%
Renewal within 90 days

A contract is up for decision

39%
Consolidating vendors

Actively cutting tool count

Free preview

6 of 589 profiles

Names, roles, companies and live signals are public. Verified emails and LinkedIn URLs stay masked until you sign in.

  1. 01

    Beatrix Nwokolo-Halvard

    Director of Revenue Operations · Sandholme Group

    Nashville, TN

    Cut the stack from 34 tools to 19 this year; two renewals in January.

    • Needs procurement
    • 100-499
    • Consolidating tools
    • Renewal window
    Email
    b•••••@sandholmegroup.com
    Locked
    LinkedIn
    View profile
    Unlocked
  2. 02

    Hyun-woo Castellanos-Byrne

    Head of IT · Cranleigh Manufacturing

    Grand Rapids, MI

    Replacing an incumbent ticketing vendor after a four-year contract lapsed.

    • Needs procurement and security
    • 500+
    • Replacing a specific vendor
    • Active
    Email
    h•••••@cranleighmanufacturing.com
    Locked
    LinkedIn
    linkedin.com/in/••••••
    Locked
  3. 03

    Oluwadamilare Petrov-Quinn

    Operations Manager · Thurlestone Studios

    Portland, OR

    Expenses anything under $3K on a card; owns 18 seats and decides same-day.

    • Buys on a company card
    • Under 25
    • Adding net-new capability
    • Fast
    Email
    o•••••@thurlestonestudios.com
    Locked
    LinkedIn
    linkedin.com/in/••••••
    Locked
  4. 04

    Marjolein Adeyeye-Frankopan

    VP People Operations · Bickerstaffe Health

    Minneapolis, MN

    Budget frozen through the fiscal year; still taking discovery calls.

    • Signs alone, invoiced
    • 100-499
    • Frozen budget
    • Thaws in Q3
    Email
    m•••••@bickerstaffehealth.com
    Locked
    LinkedIn
    linkedin.com/in/••••••
    Locked
  5. 05

    Stellan Ogundipe-Marchesi

    Chief of Staff · Wexcombe Advisory

    Boston, MA

    Runs software selection for 90 staff without a procurement function.

    • Signs alone, invoiced
    • 25-99
    • Consolidating tools
    • No procurement
    Email
    s•••••@wexcombeadvisory.com
    Locked
    LinkedIn
    linkedin.com/in/••••••
    Locked
  6. 06

    Priyanka Voskuijlen-Baptiste

    Senior Procurement Manager · Fothergill Industries

    Houston, TX

    Gates every software purchase above $10K; security review adds six weeks.

    • Needs procurement and security
    • 500+
    • Replacing a specific vendor
    • Gatekeeper
    Email
    p•••••@fothergillindustries.com
    Locked
    LinkedIn
    linkedin.com/in/••••••
    Locked
583 more locked

Unlock the full SaaS Decision Makers list

The other 583 profiles are in Articuler. A free account runs 3 directory matches a day — every match returns full profiles with verified emails and LinkedIn URLs. Upgrade for unlimited matches, filtering and export.

Sign in to unlock the full list

Free account · No credit card · Takes about 30 seconds

Opens Articuler search for “SaaS Decision Makers”

Frequently asked questions

Why is "consolidating" the largest buying posture?
Because 230 of 589 are actively trying to reduce tool count, not add to it. That inverts the usual pitch: the winning message is which two subscriptions you replace, not which new capability you add. Anyone selling a net-new category into this cohort is fighting the buyer's stated objective.
How much does seat count change the conversation?
It changes who else is involved. Under 25 seats the buyer is usually the user and decides in a week. Above 500 there is an admin, a security reviewer and a finance approver, and the same purchase takes a quarter. The 171 small-seat buyers are where a self-serve motion actually converts.
What is the practical value of the renewal window?
27% have a contract up for decision within 90 days, and in software displacement almost only happens at renewal — nobody runs two overlapping tools voluntarily. Outreach timed to that window converts several times better than the same message sent at a random point in the contract year.
Is "frozen budget" worth including at all?
Yes, precisely so you can exclude them. 74 people here have told the market their budget is frozen. Knowing that saves the sequence, and they are worth a calendar reminder rather than a pitch — frozen budgets thaw, usually at the start of a fiscal year.
How does this differ from the AI decision makers list?
Evaluation criteria. AI buying is gated on model risk, data handling and a written policy; general software buying is gated on seat economics, integration and renewal timing. The same person can appear in both directories and needs a completely different first message in each.
Does "buys on a company card" really mean no process?
It means no formal one. 134 people expense software below an internal threshold — typically $1-5K a year — which is genuinely frictionless up to that ceiling and a hard wall above it. Pricing just under a common threshold is the single highest-leverage change for reaching this group.